intro: minor rewording
Anirudh Oppiliappan 2 days ago 1 files (+9, -9)
Changed files
MODIFIED
pages/blog/intro.md
MODIFIED
pages/blog/intro.md
@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ envision a place where developers have complete ownership of their code,open source communities can freely self-govern and most importantly,coding can be social and fun again.-There are several models for decentralized social networks, ranging from-ActivityPub's federated model, to Radicle's entirely P2P model. Our-approach attempts to be the best of both worlds by adopting atproto -- a-protocol for building decentralized social applications with a central-identity.+There are several models for decentralized code collaboration platforms,+ranging from ActivityPub's (Forgejo) federated model, to Radicle's+entirely P2P model. Our approach attempts to be the best of both worlds+by adopting atproto -- a protocol for building decentralized social+applications with a central identity.@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ consolidated "view" into the whole network, allowing users to access,clone and contribute to repositories hosted across different knots --completely seamlessly.-Tangled is still in its infancy, and we're still building out several of-its core features as we dogfood it ourselves. We developed these three-core tenets to guide our decisions:+Tangled is still in its infancy, and we're building out several of its+core features as we dogfood it ourselves. We developed these three core+tenets to guide our decisions:1. Ownership of data2. Low barrier to entry@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ 3. No compromise on user-experienceCollaborating on code isn't easy, and the tools and workflows we useshould feel natural and stay out of the way. Tangled's architecture-enables common workflows to work as you'd expect, while remaining+enables common workflows to work as you'd expect, all while remainingdecentralized.We believe that atproto has greatly simplfied one of the hardest parts